Scientific Writing

Biology 695-002. Fall 2003

Wednesday, 2:15-3:55 pm, Mary Gladwin Hall 314. 2 credits

http://www.uakron.edu/biology/mitchell/writing/

Instructor:   Dr. Randy Mitchell 177 ASEC.  972-5122, rjm2_at_uakron_dot _edu 

Office Hours: M/W 1-2, or by appointment

Instructor:  Randy Mitchell 177 ASEC.  972-5122, rjm2@uakron.edu. Office Hours: M/W 1-2, or by appointment

Tentative Schedule

DATE

   TOPIC

ASSIGNMENT (due the following week)

8/27 Why write?

Paragraph of research interests.

Read Gopen and Swan.

9/3

Titles and Abstracts

In class: comment on a paragraph

Write abstract of class handout.

9/10

Thesis - introduction

Introduction (2-3 pages)

9/17

Thesis - literature review/ plagiarism

In class Comment on neighbor’s Intro. 

Literature review outline

9/24

Thesis - methods

Rough Draft (your data or distributed data)

10/1

Thesis - results

Rough Draft (your data or distributed data)

10/8

Thesis - discussion

Rough Draft (your data or distributed data) or Outline

10/15

Thesis – conclusion, references; revisions, proofing

Rough draft

10/22

Manuscript writing / review

Critique of manuscript

10/29

Publication / Journal selection/ Authorship / Cover letters

Select journal, authors and reasoning, cover letter

11/5

Presentations: Poster

Poster handout

11/12

Presentations Oral

Oral presentation (slide printout)

11/19

Research proposals

Rough draft - proposal for Sigma Xi

11/26

Writing for the public

Write a news article for the science section of a newspaper

12/3

Letters, resumés, thesis guidelines

Letter for job and grant information; resumé

12/11

Final

Writing Portfolio

 

This course is intended to help you become better at communicating scientific information through reports, papers, theses, proposals, posters, and talks. By the end of the course you should have a working draft of at least part of your thesis. We will use a “workshop’ format, in which practical application (both in and out of class) of the skills we discuss is an important part.

 

 

Grading

10 points per written assignment (one per week)

15 points for attendance

15 points for participation

other assignments may be added

 

Grading Scale:

A = >90%

B = 80-89%

C = 70-79%

 

bulletAll students in this class are expected to have mastered the basic conventions of written English (punctuation, sentence structure, usage, etc.). The course is not focused on those conventions, but instead assumes them. 
bulletAll assignments must be typed unless other arrangements are made.
bulletAttendance and participation are important to this course, and are part of the grade. Participation includes reasonable effort and attention to in class exercises.
bulletDeadlines are a reality in Science, and also in this course. Late assignments lose 25% for each day they are late, unless prior arrangements are made.
bulletAfter the initial scoring, each assignment can be revised and resubmitted ONCE for regrading. When doing so, you MUST have someone else read the revised assignment, and must include those comments, along with the original assignment, in your resubmission.  Rewrites are due two weeks after the initial due date.

 

Plagiarism.

            Diana Hacker writes, "To borrow another writer's language or ideas without proper acknowledgment is a form of dishonesty known as plagiarism" (1997. A Pocket Style Manual, 2nd Edition.  Bedford Books, Boston, p. 91).  The University of Akron regards plagiarism as a grave academic offense, which will not be tolerated.  You are guilty of plagiarism if you use, without proper acknowledgment, paragraphs, single sentences, clauses, or ideas of others, regardless of the source (scientific publications, books, pamphlets, newspapers or newsletters, commercial "term paper" services, electronic media [such as information on the Internet, CD-ROM's, etc.], papers previous students have submitted for this or other courses, and the like).  If you have any questions about what constitutes plagiarism, be sure to inquire before submitting your papers!

            If you are caught plagiarizing or cheating on any graded portion of this class, you will be reprimanded to the full extent outlined in the student handbook.  This includes one of the following actions: reduction of course grade, disciplinary probation, suspension, or outright dismissal from the University.

 

The administration has asked me to state that "Students whose names do not appear on the university's official class list will not be permitted to participate (attend class, take exams, or receive credit) without first showing proof of registration."

 

 

Traditional Resources:

   Books 

bullet

Day, R.A. 1998. How to write and publish a scientific paper. 5th ed. Oryx Press

bullet

Houp, K.W., T. E. Pearsall. 1980. Reporting technical information. 4th ed. MacMillan

bullet

McMillan, V. E. 2001. Writing papers in the Biological Sciences. 3rd ed. Bedford/St. Martin's

bullet

Pechenik, J. A. 2004. A short guide to writing about biology. Pearson Longman.

bullet

Penrose, A. M., S. B. Katz. 1998. Writing in the sciences. St. Martin's

 

 

Web Resources:

    For our assignments: 

bullet

University of Akron Thesis Guidelines: http://www.uakron.edu/gradsch/gdlnThesDiss.php 

bullet

Writing up research online: http://www.languages.ait.ac.th/EL21OPEN.HTM. Asian Institute of Technology website with good background on all the parts of a scientific paper, including some things that are hard to find such as Literature reviews:

How to have your abstract rejected: ftp://parcftp.xerox.com/pub/popl96/vanLeunenLipton. Amusing counter-advice, mostly with a computer/math perspective, but still fun.

bullet

Literature reviews and Using the literature: http://www.languages.ait.ac.th/EL21lit.htm. Has some good background, explains why it is a useful research tool, give some guidance on outlining

bullet

How to write a literature review (from Sportscience - emphasis on this as a stand-alone review paper): http://www.sportsci.org/jour/9901/wghreview.html 

bullet

The Literature Review: a few tips on conducting it: http://www.utoronto.ca/writing/litrev.html 

bullet

Methods: Ramírez-Jiménez, Antonio; García-Villanova, Belén; Guerra-Hernández, Eduardo. 2001. Effect of toasting time on the browning of sliced bread  Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81:513 - 518.  (available online through the University Library). I became aware of this through the Annals of Improbable Research: http://www.improb.com/airchives/paperair/volume9/v9i4/airhead_research.html

    

bullet

Grant Proposal guidelines from Sigma Xi for grants in aid of research (GIAR): http://www.sigmaxi.org/programs/giar/index.shtml

 

    Scientific Writing in General

bullet

Scientific writing class: Gary Ritchison of Eastern Kentucky University has a full featured website for his class  (http://www.biology.eku.edu/RITCHISO/801syl.htm). It is worth exploring - there are lots of useful suggestions and links here, and with a nice sprinkling of good humor.

bullet

Working with E-Prime (a way to improve your writing by eliminating all forms of the verb 'to be'):  http://www.generalsemantics.org/Education/WEPrime.htm. Thinking hard and reading about these issues has helped improve my writing.  This is a bigger change than simply using active voice. 

bullet

A good example of the dangers of the passive voice, from a journalistic perspective (note this is in a weblog, and contains some opinion and political content; however, the point is well taken regardless of your political views): http://www.thismodernworld.com/weblog/mtarchives/week_2003_04_27.html#000536 and http://www.thismodernworld.com/weblog/mtarchives/week_2003_04_27.html#000528 

bullet

Evaluating internet sources of information: http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/evalcrit.html

 

    Plagiarism - these sites have useful explanations on the topic. I especially like the Georgetown site

bullet

http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/bpg/plagiarism.htm

bullet

http://www.bio.davidson.edu/dept/plagiarism.html

bullet

http://sja.ucdavis.edu/avoid.htm

bullet

http://www.georgetown.edu/honor/plagiarism.html - entertaining presentation, the heilbroner example is a very good explanation of when to use quotes, and how poor use of quotes signifies poor scholarship. Good section on paraphrasing and on citing sources too.

    Being a Graduate Student

bullet

'Some Modest Advice for Graduate students' by Steve Stearns: http://faculty.washington.edu/hueyrb/advice.pdf  
bullet

        (see also the response -- 'Acynical Advice for Graduate Students' by Ray Huey http://faculty.washington.edu/hueyrb/reply.pdf)  

bullet

A little advice from 32,000 graduate students: http://chronicle.com/jobs/2002/01/2002011401c.htm

bullet

Choosing a research topic: http://chronicle.com/jobs/99/11/99111902c.htm

bullet

How to Be a Graduate Student (mostly a computer-science perspective, but still useful): http://www.cs.indiana.edu/HTMLit/how.2b/how.2b.html

bullet

Seeking a Faculty Position (written about chemistry, but useful nonetheless) http://pubs.acs.org/cen/education/8047/8047education3.html

bullet The Riley Guide Employment Opportunities and Job Resources on the Internet  http://www.rileyguide.com/

 

 

Last Updated : 12/08/03

© RJ Mitchell 2003