Week 9
Faults II. Read pages 304-313, 315-317, and 319-339 in
Chapter 6: Faults.
You are expected to read
all the sections listed below. Information from the sections in italics
will be discussed in class. You are expected to read the other
sections and you may be called on in class to answer questions
based on that material.
Dynamic Analysis of Faulting p.304-319
- Anderson's Theory of Faulting
- Experimental Deformation and Coulomb Failure
- M.King Hubbert's Sandbox Illustrations of Coulomb
Theory
- Exceptions to the Law and Special Considerations
- The Problem of Reverse Faults
Thrust Faulting p.319-339
- Regional Characteristics
- Thin-Skinned Deformation and Decollement
- Rich's Model of Bedding-Step Thrusting
- Ramp-Flat Geometry and Kinematics
- Horses, Imbricate Fans, and Duplexes
- The Moine Thrust, Northern Scotland
- Dahlstrom's Guidelines on Thrust Kinematics
- Mechanical Paradox of Thrusting
- The Wedge Model of Overthrusting
- Wedge Apparatus Experiments
return to
top of page
You should become
familiar with the following terms during this weeks lectures and
readings:
| decollement |
blind
thrust |
critical
taper |
duplex |
floor
thrust |
horse |
| imbricate fan |
klippe |
lateral ramp |
ramp |
roof
thrust |
tear fault |
| allochthonous |
antiformal
duplex |
autochthanous |
anisotropic
rocks |
| balanced
cross section |
bed-length
balancing |
cut-off
angle |
fault-bend
folds |
| fault
reactivation |
footwall
flat |
footwall
ramp |
hanging
wall flat |
| hanging
wall ramp |
Hubbert
& Rubey |
miogeoclinal
prism |
overthrusting |
| transfer
zones |
thin-skinned |
thrust
sheet |
window
(fenester) |
| tectonic
transport direction |
Anderson's
theory of faulting |
out-of-sequence
thrusts |
| coefficient
of sliding friction |
foreland-dipping
duplex |
syntectonic
basin deposits |
return to
top of page
You should be able to
answer the questions below following this week:
- What was the direction of tectonic transport for the
Canadian Rockies?
- What was the order of formation for the following thrusts
illustrated in Figure 6.83: Bourgeau thrust, Brazeau
thrust, Chatter Creek fault, McConnell thrust?
- Explain how Anderson's theory of faulting and Coulomb's
law of failure can be combined to account for the
orientations of strike-slip, thrust-slip and normal-slip
faults. What are the exceptions to this rule?
- How would the development of a critical taper in an
active thrust belt be influenced by the rate of erosion?
- The cross section below is drawn through part of the
Valley and Ridge province. Answer the following questions
on the diagram. Which side of the image is closer to the
foreland? Locate a fault plane where a hanging wall flat
overlies a footwall ramp. Locate a fault plane where a
hanging wall flat overlies a footwall flat. Locate a
fault plane where a hanging wall ramp overlies a footwall
flat. Outline a horse on the cross section. Which fault
formed first? What term can be used to describe the
assemblage of faults illustrated?

- Define what is meant by: window & klippe; fault-bend
folds; bow and arrow rule; critical taper; imbricate
thrust system; duplex.
- Highlight the differences in the evolution of fault-bend
folds and fault-propagation folds.
- Discuss the role of elevated fluid pressures in the
transportation of large thrust sheets. Include a
description of how changing fluid pressures influences
the Mohr-Coulomb failure equation.
return to
top of page
Faults II
How to determine slip
on faults
- using slickenlines, striations give
direction of slip
- match hanging wall and footwall cutoffs
to determine magnitude and sense of slip
- cut-off - line formed by the
intersection of a bed with the fault plane
- using drag folds to determine slip
- distortion of bedding due to shearing
along a fault
- folds are convex toward direction of slip
- one exception - rollover anticlines along
listric normal faults
Strain significance of
faults
- slip on normal faults extends and thins
layering (assuming it was originally horizontal)
- thrust and reverse faults shorten and
thicken layering
Dynamic analysis of faulting
We can combine our previous discussion about:
- the relationship between s1 and fault
orientation
- with observations about principal stress
orientations at the earths surface;
to explain why normal faults typically dip at
60o, thrust faults have an average dip of 30o, and strike-slip
faults are normally vertical.
- Coulombss law predicts faults should
be oriented at ~30o to s1,
maximum principal stress.
- Anderson (1951) pointed out that shear
stress must be zero at the earths surface.
- We know that shear stress is zero parallel
to principal stress directions.
- The earths surface must be a plane
containing two of the three principal stress directions.
- The third direction is perpendicular to
the first two, therefore, must be vertical.
The above conditions give us three possible
combinations of principal stresses:
- s1
vertical, s2, s3 are
horizontal - normal faults;
- s2
is vertical, s1, s3
are horizontal - strike-slip faults;
- s3
is vertical, s1, s2 are
horizontal - thrust faults.
conjugate faults - pairs of faults ~60o
apart, bisected by s1
Exceptions to the rule
- anisotropic rocks - rocks with foliations
oriented between ~25-45o to s1
will fail along the foliation plane.
- rocks with pre-existing fractures -
fractures oriented relatively close to the ideal 30o
angle will be reactivated rather than have new fractures
form.
- influence of s2 on slip
on pre-existing fractures - if s1 = s2,
slip on the existing fracture will be skewed towards the s3
direction. If s2 = s3, slip
will be along the true dip direction of the fault.
- reverse faults - reverse faults are
oriented too steeply relative to a horizontal s1 to
explain their formation. This can be explained by the
reactivation of normal faults or by complex stress fields
Thrust Faults
associated with compressional orogens, e.g.
Appalachians, Andes, Himalayas
- hinterland vs. foreland
- Appalachian orogen: plateau - valley &
ridge - blue ridge - piedmont - coastal plain
- thin-skinned vs. thick-skinned -
thin-skinned does not involve basement rocks, thick
skinned does involve basement
- detachment horizons - in weak rocks within
sedimentary section
- thrust sheet - volume of rock bounded by a
thrust
- ramps and flats: hanging wall ramp,
hanging wall flat, footwall ramp, footwall flat
complete exercise on handout
- fault-bend folds - flat-ramp-flat fault
geometry
- fault-propagation folds - flat-ramp fault
geometry (blind thrust)
- detachment folds - flat fault geometry
- horse - fault block surrounded by fault
surfaces
- multiple fault systems: imbricate faults
or duplex controlled by presence of an upper
detachment horizon
- displacement transfer multiple
thrust faults transfer displacement along the length of a
thrust belt
- klippe an erosional remnant of
thrust sheet (hanging wall) surrounded by footwall rocks
- window an exposure of the footwall
of a thrust viewed through the hanging wall
- outlier & inlier erosional
landforms where younger rocks are surrounded by older
rocks and older rocks surrounded by younger rocks,
respectively (not to be confused with klippe and window)
- determination of shortening across thrust
fault systems
Mechanical Paradox of
Overthrusting
Hubbert and Rubey showed that thrust
sheets are too big to be moved by simply pushing from the back of
the sheet. Imagine thrust sheets as rectangular blocks; the force
necessary to push the block forward must overcome the normal
force acting on the base of the block.
| Ff = frictional force
resisting sliding (sfhL) |
| Fn = normal force on base
of block (snwL = rgh x wL) |
| Ff = Fn |
| sf hL = (wL)sn |
sf = wLrgh/Lh
= wrg |
| assuming a reasonable for
rock strength is 250 MPa |
w = sf/rg =
250,000,000/10 x 2500 = 10,000 m = 10 km
|
- The above calculation assumes that the
maximum width of a thrust sheet would be approximately 10
km, clearly less than the length of many thrust sheets in
fold and thrust belts.
- Consequently, Hubbert and Rubey proposed
that normal stress must be offset by pore pressure (see
Week 7) otherwise, thrust sheets would not move, but
simply fracture at the hinterland margin.
Critical Taper
- The shape of fold and thrust belts is best
represented as a wedge.
- Recent analyses of deformation in thrust
belts have assumed that wedges develop a critical taper
(angle between top [land surface] and bottom [detachment]
surfaces of wedge) that is dependent upon the strength of
the materials and the characteristics of the detachment
plane.
- The wedge deforms internally until it
reaches the critical taper and then is translated as a
whole on the detachment plane. Erosion or the addition of
material at the toe of the wedge will alter the taper and
require further internal deformation
return to top of page
return to structure syllabus